STATE OF INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||
|
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT |
||
COUNTY OF MARION |
) |
|
|
||
|
|||||
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
) |
||||
|
) |
||||
Complainant, |
) |
||||
|
) |
||||
v. |
) |
Case No. 2018-25288-W |
|||
|
) |
|
|||
NK Holdings
LLC, |
) |
||||
|
) |
||||
Respondent. |
) |
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and
Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to Indiana Code (IC) 13-30-3-3,
entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of
any violation contained herein. Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall
not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent
may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a
proceeding to enforce this order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (Complainant) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC
13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent
is NK Holdings LLC (Respondent), which owns and/or operates the wastewater
treatment plant (WWTP) at Oakridge Estates Mobile Home Park, located at 2950
West 1100 North, Decatur, Adams County, Indiana (the Site).
3.
Respondent
is authorized by its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit No. IN0036901 (the Permit), to discharge wastewater treated in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES Permit from its WWTP into
Bulman Ditch via Outfall 001.
4.
Respondent
owns a community public water system (PWS) with PWSID No. IN5201006, serving 50
persons. The PWS is located at the Site.
5.
IDEM
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action
pursuant to IC 13-30-3.
6.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) via electronic mail to:
nickkos1@hotmail.com
7.
Pursuant
to 327 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 5-2-8(1), the Permittee shall comply
with all terms and conditions of the Permit. Any permit noncompliance
constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and Indiana Code (IC) 13 and is
grounds for enforcement action by IDEM.
8.
Respondent
is currently under Agreed Order Case No. 2009-18418-W. To date, Respondent has
failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the above noted case.
9.
Pursuant
to Part I.A.1 of the Permit, the Permittee is required to comply with the
monitoring requirements contained in the Permit, including effluent
limitations.
A
review of Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Monthly Report of Operations
(MROs) submitted by Respondent for the period of January 2017 through December
2017, revealed violations of effluent limitations contained in Part I.A.1 of
the Permit as follows:
A.
The
monthly average limitation for total suspended solids (TSS) was exceeded
January, October, and December of 2017.
B.
The
weekly average limitation for TSS was exceeded January, May, October, November,
and December of 2017.
C.
The
daily maximum limitation for E. coli was exceeded April, May, July, and October
of 2017.
D.
The
daily maximum limitation for ammonia-nitrogen was exceeded September of 2017.
Respondent
failed to comply with effluent limitations contained in the Permit; each in
violation of Part I.A.1 of the Permit and 327 IAC 5-2-8(1).
10.
Pursuant
to Part I.A.1[1] of the Permit, the Permittee is required to comply with the
effluent flow measurement per 327 IAC 5-2-13. The flow meter(s) shall be
calibrated at least once every twelve months.
Based
on an inspection on February 23, 2018, IDEM staff observed and documented that
Respondent last calibrated the flow meter in 2016; in violation of Part
I.A.1[1] of the Permit.
11.
Pursuant to Part II.B.1.a of the Permit and
327 IAC 5-2-8(8), the
Permittee is required to maintain in good working order and efficiently operate
all facilities and systems (and related appurtenances) for collection and
treatment that are:
1)
installed or used by the permittee; and
2)
necessary for achieving compliance with the
terms and conditions of the permit.
Based
on an inspection on February 23, 2018, maintenance was rated as unsatisfactory.
Respondent had excessive inflow and infiltration (I/I) in the collection
system. The aeration header and diffusers were not properly working to provide
adequate aeration; each in violation of Part II.B.1.a of the Permit.
12.
Pursuant to Part II.B.1.b of the Permit, the Permittee is
required to operate the permitted facility in a manner which will minimize
upsets and discharges of excessive pollutants, and to properly remove and
dispose of excessive solids and sludge.
Based
on an inspection on February 23, 2018, sludge disposal was rated as
unsatisfactory. The sludge is improperly removed by allowing high hydraulic
loads to wash out the solids from the aeration tank to the receiving stream.
Respondent does not have an alarm system in place to alert operators of
equipment failure; each in violation of Part II.B.1.b of the Permit.
13.
Pursuant to Part II.B.1.e of the Permit, there
shall be an ongoing preventative maintenance program for the sanitary sewer
system.
Based
on an inspection on February 23, 2018, Respondent failed to develop and implement a
preventative maintenance program for the sanitary sewer system; in violation of Part II.B.1.e of the
Permit.
14.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 5-22-10, the owner or governing body of a WWTP shall be responsible
for accomplishing the following:
a.
Provide
adequate funding and oversight to ensure the proper:
i.
operation;
ii.
maintenance;
iii.
management;
and
iv.
supervision;
of
the designated facilities.
Based
on an inspection on February 23, 2018, operation was rated as unsatisfactory
due to inadequate funding for proper or essential operation of the Site.
Respondent has not provided adequate funding to maintain the WWTP, collection
system, contract operator, and items mentioned for repairs in the March 4, 2013
Compliance Plan; in violation of 327 IAC 5-22-10.
15.
Pursuant
to Part I.A of the Permit, to assure compliance with permit terms and
conditions, the Permittee is required to comply with the monitoring requirements
contained in the Permit.
IDEM
records indicate Respondent failed to collect samples for January, April, and
May of 2018; each in violation of Part I.A of the Permit.
16.
Pursuant
to Part I.B.3 of the Permit, the Permittee shall submit accurate monitoring
reports to the IDEM containing results obtained during the previous monitoring
period and shall be postmarked no later than the 28th day of the
month following each completed monitoring period. These reports shall include,
but not necessarily be limited to, the DMRs and the MROs.
IDEM
records indicated Respondent failed to submit DMRs and MROs for January, April,
and May of 2018; each in violation of Part I.B.3 of the Permit.
17.
Pursuant
to Part II.A.14, the Permittee shall have the wastewater treatment facilities
under the responsible charge of an operator certified by the Commissioner in
classification corresponding to the classification of the WWTP as required by
IC 13-18-11-11 and 327 IAC 5-22.
IDEM
records indicate Respondent failed to appoint an operator certified by the
Commissioner; in violation of Part II.A.14.
18.
Pursuant
to 327 IAC 5-22-10(4), the Permittee shall notify IDEM when there is a change
of the person serving as the certified operator in responsible charge of the
wastewater treatment facility. The notification shall be made no later than 30
days after a change in the operator.
IDEM records indicate Respondent failed to
submit written notice to the IDEM within 30 days after a change in the person
serving as the certified operator in responsible charge, in violation of 327 IAC 5-22-10(4).
19.
Pursuant to IC
13-18-20.5-2(2), for public water systems, the annual operation fees for a community
water system with four hundred (400) or
fewer service connections, the annual operation fee is three hundred fifty dollars ($350).
Pursuant to IC 13-18-20.5-4,
in addition to the penalties prescribed under:
(1) IC 13-30-4-1;
(2) IC 13-30-4-2; and
(3) IC 13-30-5-1;
if a person does not remit a public water system annual operation fee
or installment of the fee under IC 13-16-2 to the department not later than
sixty (60) days after the date the fee is assessed or not later than thirty
(30) days after the date the installment is due, the person shall be assessed a
delinquency charge equal to ten percent (10%) of the fee or ten percent (10%)
of the installment, whichever applies.
A delinquency charge assessed under this section is due and payable
not later than sixty (60) days after the date a fee is assessed or not later
than thirty (30) days after the date an installment of the fee is due under IC
13-16-2.
Respondent failed to pay the PWS annual
operation fee and associated late fees for 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The
invoices stated that IDEM may pursue enforcement action for non-payment of
annual fees and any associated late fees. IDEM informed Respondent that the
below fees were due and payable via electronic mail or an enforcement action
will be taken. IDEM has sent Respondent eight letters, the most recent sent on
June 4, 2018. IDEM did not receive a response regarding payment.
Description |
Invoice Date |
Invoice Amount |
2015 Annual
Invoice #198160 |
1/15/2015 |
$350.00 |
2015 Late Fee
Invoice #211881 |
5/27/2015 |
$35.00 |
2016 Annual
Invoice #218387 |
1/8/2016 |
$350.00 |
2016 Late Fee
Invoice #230191 |
5/19/2016 |
$35.00 |
2017 Annual
Invoice #238788 |
1/11/2017 |
$350.00 |
2017 Late Fee
Invoice #250129 |
5/10/2017 |
$35.00 |
2018 Annual
Invoice #256730 |
1/12/2018 |
$350.00 |
2018 Late Fee
Invoice #270119 |
6/4/18 |
$35.00 |
TOTAL DUE |
$1,540.00 |
20.
Pursuant to IC
13-18-20-8(8), for semipublic permits, the annual base fee per facility is:
(1) seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) for a major
permit; and
(2) two hundred dollars ($200) for a minor permit;
plus
the following annual discharge flow fee per facility:
Daily Average Actual
Flow in
MGD Fee
001
- .05 $150
051 -
.1 $300
101 - .2 $1,000
201 -
.3 $2,000
301 -
.5 $2,500
501 -
1.0 $3,000
1.001 -2.0 $3,500
2.001 - 5.0 $4,000
5.001 -
10.0 $5,000
10.001 -
15.0 $6,500
15.001 -
30.0 $7,500
30.01 -
50.0 $10,000
50.001 -
100.0 $11,000
Pursuant to IC
13-18-20-14(14), in addition to the penalties described under:
(1) IC 13-30-4-1;
(2) IC 13-30-4-2; and
(3) IC 13-30-5-1;
if a person
does not remit an annual NPDES fee or an installment established by the
department under IC 13-16-2 to the department not more than sixty (60) days
after the date the fee is assessed or not more than thirty (30) days after the
date the installment is due, the person shall be assessed a delinquency charge
equal to ten percent (10%) of the annual fee or ten percent (10%) of the
installment, whichever is applicable.
A delinquency
charge, if applicable, is due and payable sixty (60) days after the date an annual
NPDES fee is assessed or thirty (30) days after the date the installment is
due.
Respondent failed to pay the NPDES annual operation
fee and associated late fees for 2016, 2017, and 2018. The invoices stated that
IDEM may pursue enforcement action for non-payment of annual fees and any
associated late fees. IDEM informed Respondent that the below fees were due and
payable via electronic mail or an enforcement action will be taken. IDEM has
sent Respondent six letters, the most recent sent on June 1, 2018. IDEM did not
receive a response regarding payment.
Description |
Invoice Date |
Invoice Amount |
2016 Annual
Invoice #222357 |
1/8/2016 |
$315.00 |
2016 Late Fee
Invoice #230272 |
5/17/2016 |
$35.00 |
2017 Annual
Invoice #241248RB |
1/31/2017 |
$350.00 |
2017 Late Fee
Invoice #250144 |
5/9/2017 |
$35.00 |
2018 Annual
Invoice #261545 |
1/12/2018 |
$350.00 |
2018 Late Fee
Invoice #270146 |
6/1/2018 |
$35.00 |
TOTAL DUE |
$1,120.00 |
21.
On
March 25, 2019, the Respondent notified the enforcement case manager that it
hired a Certified Operator.
22.
As
of July 2019, the Respondent began submitting DMRs and MROs electronically
using NetDMR and has submitted for each month
thereafter.
23.
On
August 30, 2019, IDEM conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection at the
facility and identified a number of concerns with the
facility. An Inspection Letter/Noncompliance
Letter was sent to the owner, Mr. Nik Kos, on September 15, 2019. A response letter was received from Mr. Kos
dated October 4, 2019. Mr. Kos reported
hiring a Certified Operator and began submitting self-monitoring reports.
24.
The
Notice of Violation contained an offer to enter into
an Agreed Order containing actions required to correct these violations.
25.
More
than 60 days elapsed since Respondent was offered the opportunity to enter into
an Agreed Order; therefore, on January 22, 2020, IDEM issued a Notice and Order
of the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management
(Commissioner’s Order) to Respondent.
26.
On
February 11, 2020, Respondent filed a Petition for Administrative Review with
the Office of Environmetal Adjudication seeking
review of the Commissioner’s Order.
27.
IDEM
and the Respondent have reached an agreement to resolve the pending
administrative review.
28.
Orders
of the Commissioner are subject to administrative review by the Office of
Environmental Adjudication under IC 4-21.5; however, in recognition of the settlement
reached, Respondent acknowledges notice of this right and waives any right to
administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (Effective Date) when it is adopted by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate (as evidenced by signature), and the
adopted Agreed Order has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall
have no force or effect until the Effective Date. In addition to addressing the
violations cited in Paragraphs 8 through 20 of the Findings of Fact above, this
Agreed Order also addresses any additional violations of these same rules that
may have occurred subsequent to the issuance of the NOV and prior to the
Effective Date.
2.
Respondent
shall comply with the rules and permit conditions listed in the findings above
at issue.
3.
Within 30 days of the
Effective Date, Respondent shall develop and submit to IDEM for approval a
Compliance Plan (CP) which identifies actions that Respondent will take to
achieve and maintain compliance with its Permit, specifically including the
actions Respondent will take to:
A.
Achieve and maintain
compliance with effluent limitations contained in the Permit.
B.
Develop and implement a preventative
maintenance program for the sanitary sewer system, which includes methods and
milestone dates for locating and eliminating sources of I/I as well as methods
to manage solids and sludge in the sewer system.
C.
Comply with reporting
requirements of the permit; and
The
CP shall include an implementation and completion schedule, including specific
milestone dates.
4.
Respondent shall, after completion of the work
required pursuant to the approved CP from Paragraph 3 above, demonstrate twelve
(12) consecutive months of compliance (Compliance Demonstration) with the terms
and conditions of the Permit, specifically including compliance with effluent
limitations and reporting requirements.
During the Compliance Demonstration, Respondent shall be subject to
stipulated penalties, as specified below, for violations of the terms and
conditions of the Permit.
In
the event that violation(s) occur during the Compliance Demonstration, within
60 days of the violation, Respondent shall develop and submit to IDEM, for
approval, an Additional Action Plan which identifies the additional actions
that Respondent will take to achieve and maintain compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Permit. The Additional
Action Plan, if required, shall include an implementation and completion
schedule, including specific milestone dates.
5.
The plans required by Paragraphs 3 and 4 above
are subject to IDEM approval. In the
event IDEM determines that any plan submitted by Respondent is deficient or
otherwise unacceptable, Respondent shall revise and resubmit the plan to IDEM
in accordance with IDEM’s notice. After
three submissions of such plan by Respondent, IDEM may seek civil enforcement
of this Order.
6.
Respondent, upon receipt of written
notification from IDEM, shall immediately implement the approved plan(s) and
adhere to the milestone dates therein.
The approved CP, as indicated in IDEM’s approval letter, including and
notification requirements deemed necessary by IDEM and Additional Action Plan
shall be incorporated into the Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable
part thereof. Failure by Respondent to
submit any plan by the specified date, or to meet any of the milestones in the
approved plan(s), will subject Respondent to stipulated penalties as described
below. Following completion of the
actions included in the Additional Action Plan, the 12-month Compliance
Demonstration, as specified in Paragraph 4 above, will re-start, and Respondent
shall be subject to stipulated penalties, as specified below, for violations of
the terms and conditions of the Permit during this time period. Failure to achieve compliance at the
conclusion of work under an Additional Action Plan may subject Respondent to
additional enforcement action.
7.
Within
10 days of each required milestone date included in the CP or AAP, Respondent
shall submit to IDEM a written progress report or notification of completion
for each milestone. Respondent shall submit to IDEM a written progress reports
until completion of the CP or Additional Action Plan.
8.
Beginning on the Effective Date and continuing
until the successful completion of implementation of the approved CP as
required by Paragraph 3 above, Respondent shall, at all times,
operate its existing wastewater treatment plant as efficiently and effectively
as possible.
9.
Respondent
must continue to accurately submit its DMRs and MROs electronically using the NetDMR live/production software, by the 28th day
of the month following the monitoring period, in accordance with Part I.B.3 of
the Permit.
10.
Within
30 days of the Effective date, Respondent shall submit any missing DMRs and MROs
electronically using the NetDMR live/production
software, in accordance with Part I. B. 3 of the Permit.
11.
Within
30 days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit the requested
clarification documentation to IDEM regarding the certified operator who was
hired on or around March 25, 2019.
12.
All
submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified
otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
Pat
Colcord, Enforcement Case Manager |
Office
of Water Quality – IGCN 1255 |
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
100
North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
13 Within
30 days of the Effective Date, Respondent shall submit payment for the fees
stated in Finding of Facts, Paragraph 19 and 20. Said fees amount shall be due
and payable within 30 days of the Effective Date, the 30th day being
a “Due Date.”
Checks
shall include the Case Number 2018-25288-D and Invoice Number, and shall be mailed
to:
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
P.O. Box 3295 |
Indianapolis,
Indiana 46206-3595 |
Payment online may be completed as
follows:
2. Under “Online Services” [scroll towards
the bottom of the page]
3. Select “Online Payment Options”
4. Select payment by “eCheck”
or “Credit Card”
5. Under “Transaction Item”
6. Select “Invoice Payments” and follow the
prompts
14.
Respondent is assessed
and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Ten Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Eight dollars ($10,968). Said penalty amount shall be
paid in twelve (12) monthly payments. All payments shall be due and payable to
the Environmental Management Special Fund. The first installment payment of
Nine Hundred Fourteen dollars ($914) shall be due within 30 days of the
Effective Date of this Agreed Order, the 30th day being the “Due
Date”. Each of the remaining eleven (11) installment payments of Nine Hundred Fourteen
dollars ($914) shall be due within 30 days of the preceding monthly due date,
the 30th day being a “Due Date.” Interest shall accrue on any amount
past due under this schedule or any outstanding amount that remains after the
12-month period at a rate established by IC 24-4.6-1-101. The interest shall
continue to accrue until the civil penalty is paid in full.
15.
In
the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated,
IDEM may assess and Respondent shall pay the corresponding stipulated penalty:
Paragraph |
Violation |
Stipulated Penalty |
3, 5 |
Failure
to submit or modify the CP within the required time period. |
$500
per week late, or part thereof. |
4, 6 |
For
violations of terms and conditions of the Permit during the Compliance
Demonstration. |
$500
per violation |
4, 5 |
Failure
to submit or modify the Additional Action Plan, if required, within the given
time period. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof. |
6 |
Failure
to implement or meet any milestone date, including notification requirements
set forth in the approved CP or Additional Action Plan. |
$500
per week late, or part thereof. |
7 |
Failure to submit to IDEM a written
report of progress or completion for each milestone date included in the CP
or Additional Action Plan. |
$250
per violation |
8 |
Failure
to operate the WWTP as efficiently and effectively as possible. |
$500
per violation. |
9 |
Failure
to accurately submit reports via NetDMR by
the 28th day of the month following the monitoring period. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof. |
10 |
Failure
to accurately submit missing reports via NetDMR within 30 days of the effective date. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof. |
11 |
Failure to submit the clarification
information regarding the notice of certified operator as required. |
$300 per week, or part thereof. |
16.
Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable no later than the 30th day after
Respondent receives written notice that IDEM has determined a stipulated
penalty is due, the 30th day
being a “Due Date.” IDEM may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated
penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a timely manner of a
stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive IDEM’s right to collect such
stipulated penalty or preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief against
Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated penalties shall preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief
against Respondent for a
violation of this Agreed Order. Such
additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including,
but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
17.
Civil
and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management
Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number 2018-25288-W of this action
and shall be mailed to:
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
Accounts
Receivable |
IGCN,
Room 1340 |
100
North Senate Avenue |
18.
This
Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent and its successors
and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they
are fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party
they represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of
Respondent shall in any way alter its status or responsibilities under this
Agreed Order.
19.
In
the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not
paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid
balance and any accrued interest at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1. The
interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date
that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. The interest shall continue to accrue
on the first of each month until the civil penalty and any interest accrued are
paid in full. Such interest shall be
payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and
shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified above.
20.
In
the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
21.
Respondent
shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent
owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall
ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons
performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed
Order.
22.
This
Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification
of an existing permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any
submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way
relieve Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its
applicable permit or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
23.
Complainant
does not, by its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner
that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result
in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable
Federal or State law or regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its
behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur
as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with
this Agreed Order.
24.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties
or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the NOV.
25.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM [or anyone acting on its behalf] from
communicating with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or
any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement
action. IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with EPA or any other
agency or entity.
26.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with all
terms and conditions of this Agreed Order and IDEM issues a Resolution of Case
(close out) letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
Department
of Environmental Management |
NK Holdings LLC |
|
|
By:__________________________ |
By:________________________ |
Samantha K.
Groce, Chief |
|
Water
Enforcement Section |
|
Surface Water, Operations & |
Printed:_____________________ |
Enforcement Branch |
|
Office of Water Quality |
Title:_______________________ |
|
|
Date:________________________ |
Date:_______________________ |
|
|
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
|
|
|
By:________________________ |
|
|
|
Date:______________________ |
|
|
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|
MANAGEMENT
THIS ___________ DAY OF ________________, 20___. |
|
|
|
|
For
the Commissioner: |
|
|
|
Signed on September 22, 2020 |
|
Martha
Clark Mettler |
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
|
Office
of Water Quality |