STATE OF
INDIANA |
) |
SS: |
BEFORE THE
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF |
||||
|
) |
|
|
||||
COUNTY OF
MARION |
) |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT |
||||
|
|||||||
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT |
) |
|
|||||
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Complainant, |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
|
v. |
|
) |
Case No. 2018-25684-C |
|||
|
|
) |
|
||||
shockney & son Inc., |
|
) |
|
||||
|
|
) |
|
||||
Respondent. |
|
) |
|
||||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant
and Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”)
13-30-3-3, entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an
admission of any violation contained herein. Respondent’s entry into this
Agreed Order shall not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable,
which Respondent may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding,
except a proceeding to enforce this order.
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant is the Commissioner (“Complainant”)
of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”), a department of
the State of Indiana created by IC 13-13-1-1.
2.
Respondent is Shockney
& Son Inc., which owns/operates a hog confined feeding operation (“CFO”), Facility
ID No. 3181, CFO Animal Waste No. 5426, located at 7473 East 100 South, in Union
City, Randolph County, Indiana (“Site”).
3.
IDEM has jurisdiction over the parties and the
subject matter of this action.
4.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice
of Violation (“NOV”) on February 6, 2019 via Certified Mail to:
J.
Mason Shockney, Registered Agent |
Shockney & Son Inc. |
7473
E. 1005 |
Union
City, IN 47390 |
5.
Respondent owns/operates a hog CFO. On March
26, 2015, Respondent obtained CFO approval AW-5426.
6.
During an investigation, including a spill
response on September 5 and 6, 2018 by representatives of the Indiana
Department of Natural Resources (“IDNR”) and IDEM, and an inspection on
September 12, 2018 by IDEM representatives, the following violations were
found:
a.
Pursuant to 327 Indiana Administrative Code
(“IAC”) 2-1-6(a)(1), all surface waters at all times and at all places,
including the mixing zone, shall meet the minimum conditions of being free from
substances, materials, floating debris, oil, or scum attributable to municipal,
industrial, agricultural, and other land use practices, or other discharges
that do any of the following:
(A)
will settle to form putrescent or otherwise
objectionable deposits;
(B)
are in amounts sufficient to be unsightly or
deleterious;
(C)
produce color, visible oil sheen, odor, or
other conditions in such degree as to create a nuisance;
(D)
are in concentrations or combinations that will
cause or contribute to the growth of aquatic plants or algae to such degree as
to create a nuisance, be unsightly, or otherwise impair the designated uses;
and
(E)
are in amounts sufficient to be acutely
toxic to, or to otherwise severely injure or kill aquatic life, other animals,
plants, or humans.
As noted during the spill response,
Respondent allowed mortality compost leachate to enter into Dismal Creek, a
water of the state, near 7473 East County Road 100 South. The discharge of
leachate was in an amount sufficient to be unsightly or deleterious, that
produced color, odor, or other conditions in such a degree to create a nuisance
and/or was in an amount to be acutely toxic to, or otherwise severely injure or
kill aquatic life, or other animals, plants, or humans. The origin of the spill
was the drainage from Respondent’s mortality compost pile to a nearby field
tile that discharges into Dismal Creek. The investigation found evidence the
leachate caused a fish kill.
b.
Pursuant to Indiana Code (“IC”) 13-18-4-5(a), a
person may not throw, run, drain, or otherwise dispose into any of the streams
or waters of this state, or cause, permit or suffer to be thrown, run, drained,
allowed to seep, or otherwise disposed into any waters, any organic or
inorganic matter that causes or contributes to a polluted condition of any
waters, as determined by 327 IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), a rule adopted by the board under
IC 13-18-4-1 and IC 13-8-4-3.
As
noted during the spill response, Respondent released mortality compost leachate
into a field tile that discharged into Dismal Creek, a water of the state.
c.
Pursuant to IC 13-30-2-1(1), a person may not
discharge, emit, cause, allow, or threaten to discharge, emit, cause, or allow
any contaminant or waste, including any noxious odor, either alone or in
combination with contaminants from other sources, into the environment in any
form that causes or would cause pollution that violates or would violate 327
IAC 2-1-6(a)(1), a rule adopted by the board under the environmental management
laws.
As noted
during the spill response, Respondent released mortality compost leachate into
a field tile that discharged into Dismal Creek, a water of the state.
d.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 19-3-1(d), all waste
management systems must be designed, constructed, and maintained to minimize
leaks and seepage and prevent manure releases or spills, as well as ensure
compliance with water quality standards in 327 IAC 2.
As noted
during the inspection on September 12, 2018, Respondent did not maintain
building labeled E-1 to minimize leaks and seepage and prevent manure releases
or spills. A leak was discovered in the northeast corner of the pit wall of
building E-1.
e.
Pursuant to 327 IAC 19-7-6(a), CFOs must carry
out proper management of dead livestock as required by 345 IAC 7-7 to ensure
that there shall be: (1) no discharge of mortality or liquids that have been in
contact with mortality to waters of the state; and (2) no disposal in a manure storage
facility that is not specifically designed to treat animal mortalities.
As noted
during the September 12, 2018 inspection, Respondent did not manage its
mortality compost pile in such a way to prevent liquids from mortalities into
Dismal Creek, a water of the state.
7. In recognition of the settlement
reached, Respondent waives any right to administrative and judicial review of
this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This Agreed Order shall be effective
(“Effective Date”) when it is approved by Complainant or Complainant’s
delegate, and has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall have no
force or effect until the Effective Date.
2.
Respondent shall comply with the statutes and rules
listed in the findings above.
3.
Effective immediately, Respondent shall cease
the release of mortality compost leachate.
4.
Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall clean up the mortality compost area and properly dispose of
all accumulated compost materials.
5.
Within one hundred five (105) days of the
Effective Date, Respondent shall submit to IDEM photo documentation showing the
completion of the cleanup of the mortality compost area. Additionally,
Respondent shall submit written documentation showing proper disposal of
accumulated compost materials (i.e, land application,
transport to solid waste land disposal, or burial).
6.
Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date,
Respondent shall repair the leak in the pit wall of Building E-1.
7.
Within one hundred five (105) days of the
Effective Date, Respondent shall submit photo documentation showing the repair
of the leak in the pit wall of Building E-1.
8.
All submittals required by this Agreed Order,
unless Respondent is notified otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
Jennifer Reno, Enforcement Case
Manager |
Office of Land Quality |
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 |
9.
Respondent is assessed and agrees to pay a
civil penalty of Zero Dollars ($0). This penalty reflects a significant reduction
from the original proposed civil penalty based upon evidence submitted to IDEM
by Respondent which adequately demonstrated Respondent’s inability to pay the
original proposed civil penalty.
10.
In the event the terms and conditions of the
following paragraphs are violated, Complainant may assess and Respondent shall
pay a stipulated penalty in the following amount:
Order
Paragraph 4 |
$500 per
week late |
Order
Paragraph 5 |
$100 per
week late |
Order
Paragraph 6 |
$500 per
week late |
Order
Paragraph 7 |
$100 per
week late |
11.
Stipulated penalties shall be due and payable
no later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written notice
that Complainant has determined a stipulated penalty is due; the 30th
day being the “Due Date”. Complainant may notify Respondent at any time that a
stipulated penalty is due. Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a timely
manner of stipulated penalty assessment shall not waive Complainant’s right to
collect such stipulated penalty or preclude Complainant from seeking additional
relief against Respondent for violation of this Agreed Order. Neither
assessment nor payment of stipulated penalties shall preclude Complainant from
seeking additional relief against Respondent for a violation of this Agreed
Order; such additional relief includes any remedies or sanctions available
pursuant to Indiana law, including, but not limited to, civil penalties
pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
12.
Stipulated penalties are payable by check to
the “Environmental Management Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case
Number of this action and shall be mailed to:
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management |
Accounts Receivable |
IGCN, Room N1340 |
100 North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis, IN 46204 |
13.
In the event that the monies due to IDEM
pursuant to this Agreed Order are not paid on or before their Due Date,
Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate established by
IC 24-4.6-1. The interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date
until the date that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. Such interest shall be
payable to the Environmental Management Special Fund, and shall be payable to
IDEM in the manner specified in Paragraph 12, above.
14.
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding
upon Respondent and its successors and assigns. Respondent’s signatories to
this Agreed Order certify that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreed
Order and legally bind the party they represent. No change in ownership,
corporate, or partnership status of Respondent shall in any way alter its status
or responsibilities under this Agreed Order.
15.
In the event that any terms of this Agreed
Order are found to be invalid, the remaining terms shall remain in full force
and effect and shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not
contain the invalid terms.
16.
Respondent shall provide a copy of this Agreed
Order, if in force, to any subsequent owners or successors before ownership
rights are transferred. Respondent shall ensure that all contractors, firms and
other persons performing work under this Agreed Order comply with the terms of
this Agreed Order.
17.
This Agreed Order is not
and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a modification of an existing
permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or approval of any submittal made
by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order, shall not in any way relieve
Respondent of its obligation to comply with the requirements of its applicable
permits or any applicable Federal or State law or regulation.
18.
Complainant does not, by
its approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner that
Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result in
compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable Federal
or State law or regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf
shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a
result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
19.
Nothing in this Agreed
Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties or injunctive
relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation, except that
IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil penalties
for the same violations specified in the NOV.
20.
Nothing in this Agreed Order
shall prevent or limit IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf from communicating
with the EPA or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this
enforcement action. IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held
liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such
communication with the EPA or any other agency or entity.
21.
This Agreed Order shall remain in effect until
IDEM issues a Resolution of Case letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
||||
Department of
Environmental Management |
Shockney
& Son Inc. |
||||
|
|
||||
By:
_________________________ |
By: _________________________ |
||||
|
Linda L. McClure, Section
Chief |
|
|||
|
Land Enforcement Section |
Printed:
______________________ |
|||
Office of Land Quality |
|
||||
|
Title: ________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
Date: __________________ |
Date:
________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
By: __________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Date: _________________________ |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
APPROVED AND
ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|||||
MANAGEMENT
THIS |
_____ |
DAY
OF |
________________________, |
20__. |
|
|
|||||
|
For the
Commissioner: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Signed on
11/19/19______ |
||||
|
Peggy Dorsey, Assistant Commissioner |
||||
|
Office of
Land Quality |
||||