STATE
OF INDIANA |
) |
|
BEFORE
THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT |
||
|
|||||
COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT Complainant, v. Urschel Laboratories, Inc., Respondent. |
) |
|
|||
AGREED ORDER
Complainant and
Respondent desire to settle and compromise this action without hearing or
adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and consent to the entry of the
following Findings of Fact and Order. Pursuant to Indiana Code (IC) 13-30-3-3,
entry into the terms of this Agreed Order does not constitute an admission of
any violation contained herein. Respondent's entry into this Agreed Order shall
not constitute a waiver of any defense, legal or equitable, which Respondent
may have in any future administrative or judicial proceeding, except a
proceeding to enforce this order.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Complainant
is the Commissioner (Complainant) of the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM), a department of the State of Indiana created by IC
13-13-1-1.
2.
Urschel
Laboratories, Inc. (Respondent) is located at 1200 Cutting Edge Drive,
Chesterton, Porter County, Indiana (the Site).
3.
Respondent
is authorized by its Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment (IWP) Permit No.
INP000645 (the Permit), to discharge wastewater treated in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the IWP Permit from its Outfall 001 into the Chesterton
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW).
4.
IDEM
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action
pursuant to IC 13-30-3.
5.
Pursuant
to IC 13-30-3-3, IDEM issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) via Certified
Mail/personal service to:
Patrick
Urschel, President and Registered Agent |
Urschel
Laboratories, Inc. |
1200 Cutting
Edge Dr. |
Chesterton,
IN 46304 |
6.
327
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 5-2-8(1), states the permittee shall comply
with all terms and conditions of the Permit. Any permit noncompliance
constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and Indiana Code (IC) 13 and is
grounds for enforcement action by IDEM.
7.
Pursuant
to Part I.A.1 of the Permit, the permittee is required to comply with the
monitoring requirements contained in the Permit, including effluent
limitations.
Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Monthly Reports of Operation (MROs) submitted by
Respondent for the period of May 2015 through October 2019 revealed violations
of effluent limitations contained in Part I.A.1 of the Permit as follows:
A.
The
daily maximum average concentration limitation for Copper was exceeded during
May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December 2015,
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August and September 2016,
November and December 2017, January 2018, and March and May 2019.
B.
The
monthly average concentration limitation for Copper was exceeded during May,
June, July, August, September, October, November and December 2015, January,
February, March, April, May, June, July, August and September 2016, January
2018, and May 2019.
C.
The
daily maximum average concentration limitation for Zinc was exceeded during
March 2016, September, November and December 2017, January and December 2018,
and January, March, April, May, July, August, September and October 2019.
D.
The
monthly average concentration limitation for Zinc was exceeded during December
2017, January 2018, and March, May, July and October 2019.
E.
The
daily maximum average concentration limitation for Oil and Grease was exceeded
during April, September and December 2017.
F.
The
daily maximum average concentration limitation for Chromium was exceeded during
May 2019.
G.
The
monthly average concentration limitation for Chromium was exceeded during May
2019.
Respondent
failed to comply with the effluent limitations from Outfall 001 contained in
the Permit, in violation of Part I.A.1 of the Permit.
8.
On
February 10, 2016 and December 14, 2017, IDEM sent Inspection Summary Letter(s)
to Respondent outlining violations at the facility. The letters required a
response detailing actions taken to correct the violations. IDEM received
responses to the letter(s) explaining compliance actions Respondent took or
would take to address the violations. However, the violations noted above
continue at the facility.
9.
Orders
of the Commissioner are subject to administrative review by the Office of
Environmental Adjudication under IC 4-21.5; however, in recognition of the
settlement reached, Respondent acknowledges notice of this right and waives any
right to administrative and judicial review of this Agreed Order.
II. ORDER
1.
This
Agreed Order shall be effective (Effective Date) when it is adopted by
Complainant or Complainant’s delegate (as evidenced by signature), and the
adopted Agreed Order has been received by Respondent. This Agreed Order shall
have no force or effect until the Effective Date. In addition to addressing the
violations cited in Paragraph 7 of the Findings of Fact above, this Agreed
Order also addresses any additional violations of these same rules that may
have occurred subsequent to the issuance of the NOV and prior to the Effective
Date.
2.
Respondent
shall comply with rules and statutes listed in the findings above at issue.
3.
Within 60 days of the
Effective Date, Respondent shall develop and submit to IDEM for approval a
Compliance Plan (CP) which identifies actions that Respondent will take to
achieve and maintain compliance with the Permit, specifically including the
actions Respondent will take to achieve and maintain compliance with effluent
limitations contained in the Permit, specifically Copper, Zinc, Oil and Grease and
Chromium. The CP shall
include an implementation and completion schedule, including specific milestone
dates.
Respondent
shall notify IDEM in writing of variations to the approved CP.
4.
Respondent shall, after completion of the work
required pursuant to the approved CP from Paragraph 3 above, demonstrate 6
consecutive months of compliance (Compliance Demonstration) with the terms and
conditions of the Permit.
5.
In
the event that violation(s) occur during the Compliance Demonstration, within
30 days of the violation, Respondent shall develop and submit to IDEM, for
approval, an Additional Action Plan (AAP) which identifies the additional
actions that Respondent will take to achieve and maintain compliance with the
terms and conditions of the Permit. The AAP, if required, shall include an
implementation and completion schedule, including specific milestone dates.
6.
The plans required by Order Paragraphs 3 and 5
are subject to IDEM approval. In the event IDEM determines that any plan
submitted by Respondent is deficient or otherwise unacceptable, Respondent
shall revise and resubmit the plan to IDEM in accordance with IDEM’s notice.
After three submissions of such plan by Respondent, IDEM may seek civil
enforcement of this Order.
7.
Respondent, upon receipt of written
notification from IDEM, shall immediately implement the approved plan(s) and
adhere to the milestone dates therein. The approved CP and AAP shall be
incorporated into the Agreed Order and shall be deemed an enforceable part
thereof.
Following
completion of the actions included in the AAP, the 6 month Compliance
Demonstration, as specified in Paragraph 4 above, will re-start. Failure to
achieve compliance at the conclusion of work under an AAP may subject
Respondent to additional enforcement action.
8.
Within 10 days of each required milestone date
included in the CP or AAP, Respondent shall submit to IDEM a written progress
report or notification of completion for each milestone.
9.
Beginning on the Effective Date and continuing
until the successful completion of the approved CP, Respondent shall, at all
times, operate its facility as efficiently and effectively as possible.
10.
All
submittals required by this Agreed Order, unless Respondent is notified
otherwise in writing by IDEM, shall be sent to:
Grant
Chaddock, Enforcement Case Manager |
Office
of Water Quality – IGCN 1255 |
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
100
North Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis,
IN 46204-2251 |
11.
Respondent
is assessed and agrees to pay a civil penalty of Nine Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($9,900). Said penalty amount shall be due and payable to the “Environmental
Management Special Fund” within 30 days of the Effective Date, the 30th
day being a “Due Date.”
12.
In
the event the terms and conditions of the following paragraphs are violated,
IDEM may assess and Respondent shall pay the corresponding stipulated penalty:
Paragraph |
Violation |
Stipulated Penalty |
3 |
Failure
to submit the CP within the required time period. |
$250
per week late, or part thereof. |
4 |
For
violations of terms and conditions of the Permit during the Compliance
Demonstration. |
$400
per violation |
5 |
Failure
to submit the AAP, if required, within the given time period. |
$500
per week late, or part thereof. |
6 |
Failure
to modify the CP and/or AAP, if required, within the given time period. |
$500
per week late, or part thereof. |
7 |
Failure
to meet and/or implement any milestone date set forth in the approved CP or
AAP. |
$500
per week late, or part thereof. |
8 |
Failure to submit to IDEM a written
progress report within 10 days of each milestone date. |
$150
per week late, or part thereof. |
9 |
Failure
to operate the facility as efficiently and effectively as possible prior to
Compliance Demonstration. |
$200
per violation. |
13.
Stipulated
penalties shall be due and payable no
later than the 30th day after Respondent receives written
notice that IDEM has determined a stipulated penalty is due, the 30th day being a “Due Date.”
IDEM may notify Respondent at any time that a stipulated penalty is due.
Failure to notify Respondent in writing in a timely manner of a stipulated
penalty assessment shall not waive IDEM’s right to collect such stipulated
penalty or preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief against Respondent for violation
of this Agreed Order. Neither assessment nor payment of stipulated penalties shall preclude IDEM from seeking additional relief
against Respondent for a violation
of this Agreed Order. Such additional
relief includes any remedies or sanctions available pursuant to Indiana law, including,
but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to IC 13-30-4.
14.
Civil
and stipulated penalties are payable by check to the “Environmental Management
Special Fund.” Checks shall include the Case Number 2019-26620-W of this action
and shall be mailed to:
Indiana
Department of Environmental Management |
Accounts
Receivable |
IGCN, Room
1340 |
100 North
Senate Avenue |
Indianapolis,
Indiana 46204 |
15.
This
Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon Respondent, his successors and
assigns. Respondent’s signatories to this Agreed Order certify that they are
fully authorized to execute this Agreed Order and legally bind the party they
represent. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status of
Respondent shall in any way alter his status or responsibilities under this
Agreed Order.
16.
In
the event that the monies due to IDEM pursuant to this Agreed Order are not
paid on or before their Due Date, Respondent shall pay interest on the unpaid
balance and any accrued interest at the rate established by IC 24-4.6-1. The
interest shall be computed as having accrued from the Due Date until the date
that Respondent pays any unpaid balance. The interest shall continue to accrue
on the first of each month until the civil penalty and any interest accrued are
paid in full. Such interest shall be payable to the “Environmental Management
Special Fund,” and shall be payable to IDEM in the manner specified above.
17.
In
the event that any terms of this Agreed Order are found to be invalid, the
remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed
and enforced as if this Agreed Order did not contain the invalid terms.
18.
Respondent
shall provide a copy of this Agreed Order, if in force, to any subsequent
owners or successors before ownership rights are transferred. Respondent shall
ensure that all contractors, firms and other persons performing work under this
Agreed Order comply with the terms of this Agreed Order.
19.
This
Agreed Order is not and shall not be interpreted to be a permit or a
modification of an existing permit. This Agreed Order, and IDEM’s review or
approval of any submittal made by Respondent pursuant to this Agreed Order,
shall not in any way relieve Respondent of his obligation to comply with the
requirements of his applicable permits or any applicable Federal or State law
or regulation.
20.
Complainant
does not, by his approval of this Agreed Order, warrant or aver in any manner
that Respondent’s compliance with any aspect of this Agreed Order will result
in compliance with the provisions of any permit, order, or any applicable
Federal or State law or regulation. Additionally, IDEM or anyone acting on its
behalf shall not be held liable for any costs or penalties Respondent may incur
as a result of Respondent’s efforts to comply with this Agreed Order.
21.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent or limit IDEM’s rights to obtain penalties
or injunctive relief under any applicable Federal or State law or regulation,
except that IDEM may not, and hereby waives its right to, seek additional civil
penalties for the same violations specified in the Notice of Violation.
22.
Nothing
in this Agreed Order shall prevent IDEM (or anyone acting on its behalf) from
communicating with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)
or any other agency or entity about any matters relating to this enforcement
action. IDEM or anyone acting on its behalf shall not be held liable for any
costs or penalties Respondent may incur as a result of such communications with
the US EPA or any other agency or entity.
23.
This
Agreed Order shall remain in effect until Respondent has complied with the
terms and conditions of this Agreed Order and IDEM issues a Resolution of Case
(close out) letter to Respondent.
TECHNICAL
RECOMMENDATION: |
RESPONDENT: |
Department of
Environmental Management |
Urschel
Laboratories, Inc. |
|
|
By:__________________________ |
By:________________________ |
Samantha K.
Groce, Chief |
|
Water
Enforcement Section |
|
Surface Water, Operations & |
Printed:_____________________ |
Enforcement Branch |
|
Office of Water Quality |
Title:_______________________ |
|
|
Date:________________________ |
Date:_______________________ |
|
|
|
COUNSEL
FOR RESPONDENT: |
|
|
|
By:________________________ |
|
|
|
Date:______________________ |
|
|
APPROVED
AND ADOPTED BY THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL |
|
MANAGEMENT
THIS ___________ DAY OF ________________, 20___. |
|
|
|
|
For
The Commissioner: |
|
|
|
Signed on April 24, 2020 |
|
Martha
Clark Mettler |
|
Assistant
Commissioner |
|
Office
of Water Quality |