Resources & FAQ

The Indiana Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices governs the installation of traffic signals on all roads in the state. The manual, used by all state, county and local government agencies, is derived from a similar U.S. Manual to insure uniform applications throughout the country.

To qualify for a traffic signal, a location must meet at least one of the warrants discussed below. However the satisfaction of a signal warrant or a combination of warrants does not necessarily mean that a traffic signal will be installed or that it is the best traffic control device for a location.

Warrants of General Applicability

• Eight-hour Vehicle Volume:
• Vehicular Volume "Warrant": Where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason for signal consideration and minimum volumes are met on the major street and the higher-volume minor-street approach.
• Interruption of Continuous Traffic "Warrant": Where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersection street suffers excessive delay or hazard in entering or crossing.
• Four-hour vehicle volume: Where the volume of intersecting traffic reaches a particularly high threshold for four hours a day.
• Pedestrian Volume "Warrant": Where there is a combination of heavy vehicular traffic and crosswalk volume.

Warrants for Specific Circumstances

• Peak-hour: For intersections in close proximity to a high volume traffic generator such as a factory, high school, or office park that attracts or discharges a large number of vehicles over a short time, where traffic conditions are such that for at least one hour a day the minor street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street.
• School Crossing: Where there are insufficient gaps in normal traffic during the time school children use the crossing.
• Coordinated Signal System: Where at carefully selected locations within an interconnected signal system, it is possible to group vehicles and regulate group speeds.
• Crash Experience: Where crashes (e.g. right angle crashes) have been reported that could be corrected by a signal.
• Roadway Network: Where two major routes intersect or where it is desirable to interconnect one signal system to another.
• Intersection Near a Railroad Crossing: for intersections where an at-grade railroad crossing on the minor street is located in close proximity to the major street and the traffic signal is necessary so that vehicles do not queue on the railroad tracks.

You may have noticed that traffic volumes play a large role in many of the "warrants". Experience has shown that if the volumes are below a certain value (which varies with the physical characteristics of the intersecting roads), the chances are that a signal would not help move traffic.

When a request for a signal is received:

• A traffic count is conducted at the intersection to determine if vehicle volumes meet required levels.
• INDOT reviews the types of crashes that have occurred at the intersection and whether that type can be corrected by a signal. Signals alone cannot prevent left-turn crashes.  A traffic signal can only assign the right of way, it cannot guarantee it. A motorist must still use caution on entering an intersection even when the signal is green. The investigation may also indicate that other traffic control devices or road modifications would be better than a signal for reducing crashes. Among the other traffic controls which may be considered are: no parking zones, flashing beacons or stop signs.

A field study of the location is made by a traffic investigator. Statistics can be misleading, so after studying the traffic counts and crash records, the traffic investigator makes one or more field inspections to observe the physical characteristic of the intersection and behavior of the traffic. When necessary, the local police and other officials are also contacted to hear their first-hand account of the traffic conditions. Only then is an action recommended. If one or more criteria for a signal is met, a signal installation may be the recommended action. If it is not "warranted," the engineer must decide whether other traffic control devices or road modifications should be used, based on their own warrants. Under some circumstances other traffic control devices or road modifications may be made in addition to installing a traffic signal.

When a signal is installed at a state highway intersection, the state generally pays the entire cost. If an intersection is formed by a state highway and a local road, the local government agency may pay a portion of the cost or facilitate right-of-way acquisition in order to expedite installation.

In the case of a signal installed to service a private commercial or industrial establishment (such as a shopping center), the private interest pays the complete cost of installation and major maintenance.

But regardless who pays for it, INDOT’s decision to install a signal is based on conditions and traffic flows at the intersection and not how much the signal will cost.

A few years ago INDOT started exclusively using LED lighting and in fact is in the middle of a statewide effort to change out the old High-Pressure Sodium Vapor (HPS) luminaires for LED. In doing so we’ve received comments that the new lights seem so much brighter than the old- there are two primary reasons for this. For one the old luminaires have generally been in service for a long time and so have lost efficiency (ability to convert electrical energy to light), this means that the older luminaires haven’t been producing as much light as they initially did. Secondly LEDs produce a full spectrum, white color light which creates an environment that is easier to see in than HPS which generates an orangish-yellow tinted light. LEDs enhance visibility as certain colors, for example brown, tends to “wash out” under HPS lighting.

LED lighting also offers the advantage of reduced energy consumption- all of the models that have been approved by INDOT use somewhere between one-half to three-quarters the energy of HPS.

The lighting industry is still developing LED technology to be even more efficient and reliable, at this point HPS is all but obsolete and so is no longer used by INDOT on construction projects.

INDOT replaces signs on average every 20 years and does this replacement along an entire highway segment within the district -our maintenance crews perform the work. The 20-year cycle is based on the service life of the sign sheeting, taking into account the amount of retroreflectivity that a sign needs and how this changes over time – fading of the sign background color is also accounted for. Retroreflectivity is the ability of the sheeting to reflect car headlight back to the driver. Our field studies have shown that more than adequate retroreflectivity is maintained even at 20 years and that red is the background color most susceptible to fading.